HO-1, HO-2, HO-3, HO-5: Homeowners Policy Types Explained
The HO-3 vs HO-5 question comes up for nearly every homeowner shopping for coverage, because those two forms account for the vast majority of policies written in the U.S. today. Understanding what HO-1, HO-2, HO-3, and HO-5 actually cover — and where the coverage stops — helps a buyer avoid overpaying for a low-tier form or leaving a valuable home under-insured. This guide walks through each form, the pricing gap between them, and the situations where the jump to HO-5 pays for itself.
In this article
What HO-1 Through HO-5 Actually Mean
The HO prefix stands for homeowners, and the number identifies a standard policy form written by the Insurance Services Office (ISO). Carriers adopt these templates with minor tweaks. Six forms are in wide use — HO-1, HO-2, HO-3, HO-4 (renters), HO-5, HO-6 (condo), and HO-8 (older homes) — but a typical single-family owner only encounters four: HO-1, HO-2, HO-3, and HO-5.
Two variables separate them. First, what perils are covered. Second, whether coverage is written on a named-perils basis (only pays when damage matches a listed cause) or an open-perils basis (pays for any cause not specifically excluded). Open perils shifts the burden of proof to the insurer, and it is the main reason more expensive forms cost more.
Loss valuation is the other lever. Newer forms default to replacement cost value on the dwelling; older forms often pay actual cash value, which subtracts depreciation before the claim check goes out.
HO-1 and HO-2: The Basic Forms Most Buyers Skip
HO-1 is the most stripped-down form still on the books. It covers a short list of usually 10 perils on a named basis: fire, lightning, wind, hail, explosion, riot, aircraft, vehicles, smoke, and vandalism. Theft is often excluded. Many states no longer permit HO-1 policies for standard homes, and most major national carriers stopped writing them years ago. When available, they run 10-20% cheaper than an HO-3 but rarely make sense unless a homeowner cannot qualify for anything better.
HO-2 adds more covered perils — typically 16 — including falling objects, weight of ice and snow, accidental water damage from plumbing, and freezing pipes. Coverage is still named-perils on both the dwelling and contents. HO-2 shows up most often on:
- Manufactured homes and older properties that don't qualify for open-perils coverage
- Rental dwellings the owner doesn't live in
- Homes in high-risk regions where carriers have pulled back HO-3 capacity
Premiums run roughly 5-15% below an HO-3 in the same market. For owner-occupied single-family homes, HO-2 is a step down worth avoiding unless nothing else is on the table.
HO-3: The Standard American Homeowners Policy
Roughly 80% of homeowners policies written in the U.S. today are HO-3 forms. It's the default template most agents quote first, and it splits coverage in a way that keeps premiums manageable:
- Dwelling and other structures — open perils. Any physical loss is covered unless the policy excludes it.
- Personal property — named perils. Contents are covered only for a list of specific causes of loss.
- Loss of use — pays additional living expenses if the home becomes uninhabitable after a covered claim.
- Personal liability and medical payments — covers lawsuits and small injuries on the property.
Standard exclusions on the dwelling side include flood, earthquake, wear and tear, mold beyond a small sublimit, sewer backup unless endorsed, and losses from neglect. Each has to be added back through a separate policy or endorsement — flood through the NFIP or a private carrier, earthquake through a state pool, sewer backup as a $10-40 annual endorsement.
The gap most buyers overlook sits on the contents side. If a burst pipe destroys a laptop, that's a covered peril. If the laptop simply falls off a desk and shatters, that's not on the named-peril list, and the HO-3 pays nothing.
Time to review your homeowners policy?
Comparing quotes every 12-24 months often surfaces discounts your current insurer will not volunteer.
How to shop home insuranceHO-5: The Premium Form and What It Costs
HO-5 (the Comprehensive Form) upgrades the personal property side to open perils. That single change is the biggest coverage difference between an HO-3 and an HO-5. On an HO-5, the burden of proof shifts to the insurer — if the contents were damaged and the cause isn't on the exclusion list, the claim gets paid.
The other quiet upgrade is loss settlement. Many HO-5 policies pay contents at replacement cost by default rather than requiring an endorsement, and some carriers waive depreciation on partial dwelling losses. A few premium carriers — Chubb, PURE, AIG Private Client, and Cincinnati among them — only sell HO-5 forms because their target customer expects that level of coverage without arguing.
Common HO-5 advantages over an HO-3 in real claims:
- Accidental damage to electronics, jewelry, or furniture is covered
- Higher default sublimits on jewelry, typically $5,000-10,000 versus the $1,500 on an HO-3
- Broader theft coverage on items away from home
- Fewer coverage disputes because the burden of proof favors the policyholder
Premiums typically run 10-25% above an equivalent HO-3, though the gap narrows on homes above roughly $500,000 in dwelling value where carriers price the two forms similarly. Below about $200,000 in coverage, some carriers won't write an HO-5 at all.
HO-3 vs HO-5: How to Decide
The HO-3 vs HO-5 decision usually comes down to three factors: how much personal property is in the home, how easily contents damage can be documented, and how large the premium gap is in absolute dollars.
| Feature | HO-3 | HO-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Dwelling coverage | Open perils | Open perils |
| Personal property | Named perils | Open perils |
| Contents loss settlement | ACV default, RCV endorsement | RCV default (varies by carrier) |
| Jewelry sublimit | $1,000-1,500 typical | $5,000-10,000 typical |
| Typical premium | Baseline | 10-25% higher |
| Available on lower-value homes | Yes | Often not below ~$200K dwelling |
An HO-5 tends to pay off when the home has $50,000 or more in personal property, when dwelling coverage exceeds $400,000, or when the buyer prioritizes shorter claim disputes over the lowest possible premium. An HO-3 is usually the smarter buy on homes under $250,000 in replacement cost, when the premium gap exceeds 20%, or when a scheduled personal property rider can plug the specific gap the buyer worries about.
Cost Differences and When Upgrading Pays Off
National average premiums for an HO-3 sat around $1,900-2,300 in 2025 depending on the state, with wide swings by ZIP code. An equivalent HO-5 typically adds $150-500 to that annual bill. In high-cost states like Florida, Louisiana, and Oklahoma, the dollar gap tends to be larger because both premiums scale with catastrophe risk. In low-cost states like Vermont or Ohio, the extra premium can drop below $10 a month.
The math for whether to upgrade is straightforward: compare the annual premium delta to the marginal coverage gained. If an HO-5 costs $250 more per year and eliminates a $1,500 jewelry sublimit while adding open-perils protection on $75,000 of contents, most homeowners come out ahead — a single dropped laptop or damaged mattress that wouldn't have qualified under an HO-3 covers the premium jump for several years.
A few practical notes when shopping the two forms:
- Not every carrier offers an HO-5 in every state. In Louisiana, Florida, and parts of California, availability tightens after a bad storm year.
- Some carriers sell an HO-3 with special personal property endorsement that mimics the HO-5 upgrade at a lower cost — worth asking for both quotes.
- Scheduled personal property (a jewelry rider, fine art rider, or firearms rider) can plug the biggest HO-3 gaps without the full HO-5 premium.
At the top of the market, an HO-5 becomes the default rather than an upgrade. Below about $150,000 in dwelling coverage, most buyers stay on an HO-3 because carriers price the two comparably or the HO-5 simply isn't offered.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is HO-5 worth the extra premium?
For most homes with $50,000 or more in personal property and dwelling coverage above $400,000, the 10-25% premium jump for HO-5 pays off in a single contents claim. On smaller homes with modest belongings, adding a scheduled personal property rider to an HO-3 often delivers most of the coverage upgrade at a lower cost. The clearest sign HO-5 is worth it: the buyer would fight a $500 depreciation deduction on a claim.
What is the biggest difference between HO-3 and HO-5?
HO-3 covers the dwelling on an open-perils basis but limits personal property to a list of named perils, while HO-5 extends open-perils coverage to personal property too. In practical terms, HO-5 pays for accidental damage to contents that HO-3 excludes — a dropped laptop, a spilled glass on a leather couch, or a broken TV are examples that typically only get paid under an HO-5.
Do most carriers still write HO-1 or HO-2 policies?
Very few carriers write HO-1 policies today, and several states no longer permit them for standard homes. HO-2 is still available but tends to show up on manufactured homes, older properties that can't qualify for open-perils coverage, and homes in catastrophe-prone regions where carriers have pulled back HO-3 capacity. For most owner-occupied single-family homes, an HO-3 or HO-5 is the practical choice.
Does an HO-3 cover accidental damage to personal property?
Not by default. HO-3 covers personal property only for named perils like fire, theft, or specific water losses, so a dropped or spilled item generally isn't paid. Buyers who want that coverage typically upgrade to an HO-5 or add a special personal property endorsement, which extends open-perils treatment to contents on an HO-3 for a smaller premium bump.